This document aims to present the method used to analyse with finite elements software the rail button of the Firehorn rocket. Indeed, this assembly is subjected to various loads during the launch.
The rail button is the part directly connected to the guiding raail of Firehorn, therefore it is the part that reacts to the engine thrust. The thrustplate is also connected to the Engine bay through the thrustplate, where it is attached with 2 screws. It is made up of a chasis and a main button being attached with screws.

The chasis is machined in 2050-T84 alloy. This alloy has the following properties:

The button uses PEI which has the following properties:

As said before the guides the rocket therefore the main force is applied on the inner faces of the button and can also be translated to the chasis. This force has been calculated to be 4400N.
The software used for the FEA analysis was Ansys, ans the CAD of the piece was made using Solidworks
The simulation performed was a static structural analysis to estimate the Von mises constraints for the load case of 44400N
The goal of the simulation is to validate that the rail button can withstand a load of 4400 kN to the designated surface with a MoS of 0.25, knowing that the material yield strength is 67 MPa for PEI and 476 MPa for the chasis.
We use the following unit system: mm-t-N-s-mV-mA
The material properties used were:
Aluminium 2050-T84

and for PEI:

The boundary counditions were:


Time was not taken into account for these simulations.
The two meshes used were 1mm and 0.5mm
No refinement has been applied.
Here is a picture of the 1mm mesh 

Here is the simulation for the 1mm mesh:
Button:
For the equivalent stress:

For the total deformation:

Chasis:
For the equivalent stress:


For the total deformation:

Here is the simulation for the 0.5mm mesh:
Button
For the equivalent stress:

For the total deformation:

Chasis
For the equivalent stress:


For the total deformation:

The MoS, is only attained on the chasis with a MoS of (476/185) - 1 = 1.57. The Button presents an accumulation of stress around the fixed support which we can ignore, the calculated MoS is therefore (67/51) - 1 = 0.31
The goal of reaching a 0.25 MoS is therefore attained